| 10.11.2
|
Damage to top, debris inside. Marks and chips across body
|
|
| 13.10.31
|
Head fragment, facial features worn. Damage to top of head and over right eye.
|
|
| 14.9.17
|
Traces of glue hint at a previous repair but the repaired piece is missing. Small spots of deposit on both surfaces. Slight surface damage to the concave surface.
|
|
| 14.9.21
|
Joined unevenly due to erosion of the edges. Small spots of dark deposit on exterior surface. Surface damage to underside where paint has been rubbed away.
|
|
| 14.9.24
|
Colour in good condition and the surface has no significant deposit or damage.
|
|
| 14.9.44
|
Small areas of pink deposit. The outer ripples appear somewhat blurred. No damage to rim.
|
|
| 14.9.48
|
Red paint nearly entirely worn from rim. Some surface damage to the outer surface as paint has flaked away. Some dark deposits on the outer surface too.
|
|
| 14.9.57
|
About half lid preserved. Some surface damage to the exterior surface. Chips to rim and to handle. Paint worn on areas of the design.
|
|
| 14.9.72
|
Some loss of paint on outer surface. Some surface damage to underside probably caused at time of fracture.
|
|
| 14.9.8
|
Paint is dull and wearing away on both sides. Surface is smooth with no particular damage.
|
|
| 2006.12.15
|
Fragment; fading of decoration; discolouration of clay suggests possible fire damage
|
|
| 2006.12.68
|
Fragment; slight hints of fire damage
|
|
| 2007.10.2.237
|
Slight damage to surface
|
|
| 2007.10.2.241
|
Some surface damage
|
|
| 2007.10.2.296
|
Some damage to the bottom left corner of the cast.
|
|
| 2007.10.2.301
|
Intact, apparent damage possible from original gem stone
|
|
| 2007.4.75
|
Fragment; signs of fire damage; Heraeum written on in pencil
|
|
| 2007.4.78
|
Fragment; possible fire damage; Heraeum written on in pencil
|
|
| 2007.9.1.31
|
Intact, some damage to outer border.
|
|
| 2007.9.1.33
|
Intact, some surface damage.
|
|
| 2007.9.1.35
|
Intact, some surface damage.
|
|
| 2007.9.1.56
|
Intact, some surface damage.
|
|
| 2007.9.2.32
|
Intact, some surface damage.
|
|
| 2007.9.2.33
|
Intact, some surface damage.
|
|
| 22.11.1
|
Intact. Chalky white deposits. Colour remains good. Very minimal surface damage.
|
|
| 22.3.35
|
Fragmentary though well kept overall with minimal chippings or damage.
|
|
| 26.2.26
|
Underside has slight patches of discolouration and bands are starting to fade. The topside has lost the white decoration so that only traces remain. No surface damage or deposit.
|
|
| 26.2.28
|
Painted bands on underside are wearing away considerably compared to the topside which has retained most of its colour apart from some white but it is now a little dull. Surfaces are all still smooth with no significant damage.
|
|
| 26.2.31
|
Underside is dull and discoloured. The colouring on the top is good except for the bands which have faded. There is some surface damage here too.
|
|
| 26.7.10
|
Incomplete. Apart from the head missing, there is little damage. There are small holes and scratches on the surface, front and back. The white slip has almost completely worn away, evident now only in small areas.
|
|
| 28.6.6
|
Damage to one handle almost breaking the circle. Complete handle has deposits (perhaps from burial). Paint is very worn and in most places only staining remains. For such a fragile rim it is in excellent condition with no chips.
|
|
| 45.10.16
|
Three fragments of an incomplete mouth of Black figure amphora. i) one chip on top edge of rim, one chip bottom tip of inside edge. Outside edge multiple small chips and marks. ii) multiple small scuffs and chips on top edge of moth with one larger chip. Inside edge multiple tiny chips, left outter edge glaze chipped. Exterior edge a few small chips and marks in slip. iii) smallest fragment with lots of damage and chips, white deposits on rim and top of external edge.
|
|
| 45.10.21
|
Two small fragments that Annie Ure has catalouged as coming from same vessel.i) chips along the edges of the exterior of the fragment as well as on black decoration, White deposits on both external and inrternal sides. ii) exterior shows damage and places where the decoration has rubbed off
|
|
| 45.10.5
|
Comprised of nine rejoined fragments and nine loose fragments, one of which shows the head and shoulders of a youth, badly damaged in fire. Five pieces were badly damaged when it was found in 1979 - more detailed in Ure inventory. Underside has been repainted. Exterior surface design is in remarkably good condition considering the damage done to the interior surface. Stem remains but the foot is completely missing.
|
|
| 48.5.1
|
Intact. Pattern inside remains clear but some of the main pictures have faded badly (especially C). No significant damage to rims or handles.
|
|
| 51.4.4
|
Chips missing from the rim (ca. 7, including damage on the meander pattern) and the neck (ca. 5). There are also small bits missing at the joining point of the two parts of the fragment.
|
|
| 59.2.1
|
complete, slight bubbles and damage to glaze on underside of the amulet
|
|
| 65.6.2
|
Broken off at the shoulders; small white deposit at fracture. Highly polished with no surface damage. The scratches caused through production are still visible.
|
|
| 78.12.13
|
Intact, part of the base is missing, hairline fracture radiating from this damage. Wash is worn, especially on the decoration and base. Large amount of grey deposit all over, interior and exterior.
|
|
| 78.12.21
|
Intact, upper right half of nozzle is missing, long hairline crack reaching down into the centre of the base from ths damage. Signs of use visible on nozzle. Fracture around the edge of the discus continuing along the nozzle to the wick hole. Brownish red wash is worn, large amount of white-grey deposit
|
|
| 79.1.11
|
Handle broken off. Damage at mouth of spout. Rough surface on base. Colour on outer surface is worn in places.
|
|
| 83.2.3
|
Fragment covered with black deposit, clearly broken off from another object, and is rough and bumpy, likely owing to damage caused over time.
|
|
| 84.5.2
|
Two pieces glued together (adhesive visable on reverse), chipped and dameged at the bottom of join. Small amount of damage to top left edge. Damage to section of bottom edge register.
|
|
| E.23.13
|
No discernable damage
|
|
| E.23.29
|
appears to have no restoration or recent damage. The pottery is very rough with innumerable shallow chips, and there is a large amount of white deposit all over the object, a particularly large patch can be found near the base.
|
|
| E.23.49.1
|
Intact no discernable damage or deposit.
|
|
| E.23.49.2
|
Intact, no damage but some brown deposit around the edges on the top side.
|
|
| E.23.49.3
|
Intact, no discernable damage or deposit
|
|
| E.23.49.5
|
Intact, no discernable damage or deposit.
|
|
| E.23.6
|
Intact, no deposit or significant damage.
|
|
| E.23.7
|
Intact, no deposit or discernable damage
|
|
| E.23.8
|
Intact, no discernable damage or deposit.
|
|
| E.62.16
|
Intact and complete. Some of the black pigment has gone and several edges have slight scratches. The most significant damage is a scratch on the side with twelve dots that goes from one side in a straight line to the other.
|
|
| E.62.17
|
Intact and complete. The details are still clear and there is no obvious damage to the artefact.
|
|
| E.62.2
|
Intact if fragmentary. The detail is refined and there is no deposit on the surphace. No discernable damage.
|
|
| E.62.5
|
Intact, with no apparent damage to surface.
|
|
| E.62.55
|
Intact and complete, there is no damage aside from some imperfections on the base. There is also a few areas of black deposit on the inside of the vase.
|
|
| E.63.13C
|
Single fragment. The blue glaze is well preserved, and there is very little visible damage to the surface although it is quite rough to the touch.
|
|
| L.2013.10.1
|
Intact, very worn with surface damage and grey deposits especially in the incisions
|
|
| L.2013.10.3
|
Details of scarab body now faded and surface uneven, there is damage to the base and one side of legs.
|
|
| L.2016.3.16
|
Intact, no discernible damage.
|
|
| L.2016.3.17
|
Intact, no discernible damage. Minimal white deposits around the ending edge (of the long sides).
|
|
| L.2016.3.18
|
Intact, no discernible damage.
|
|
| L.2016.3.19
|
Intact, no discernible damage.
|
|
| L.2016.3.20
|
Intact, no discernible damage.
|
|
| L.2016.3.21
|
Intact, no discernible damage.
|
|
| L.2016.3.22
|
Intact, no discernible damage.
|
|
| L.2016.3.23
|
Intact, no discernible damage.
|
|
| REDMG:1935.87.29
|
Intact. Paint worn from rim and edge of one handle. Some damage to inside near to stamped palmettes. Glaze remains silvery.
|
|
| REDMG:1958.61.1
|
Handle, some damage to woman's face and some wear to bronze in the centre of the handle.
|
|
| REDMG:1964.1611.1
|
Intact, centre of discus is obscured by damage, many small chips in the surface. Large amount of grey deposit on the interior and the back of the exterior.
|
|
| REDMG:1964.1653.1
|
Neck and mouth missing. Base damaged. Some damage to the side of the object - appears to have been crushed on one sode.
|
|
| REDMG:1964.1719.1
|
Over half of the object is missing, but the half that remains is in good condition with no significant damage. Some deposits have collected in base.
|
|
| TEMP.2007.2 29
|
Fragment; fire damage
|
|
| TEMP.2007.2.49
|
Fragment; Damaged by fire, with chipping of decoration probably due to this damage. Munsell colours are for unburnt and burnt parts respectively
|
|
| TEMP.2007.2.51
|
Fragment, possile fire damage, scratches and chips in glaze
|
|
| TEMP.2007.2.52
|
Fragment, fire damage, chips and scratches
|
|
| TEMP.2007.2.54
|
Fragment; some damage to glaze
|
|
| TEMP.2007.2.57
|
Fragment; parts with fire damage
|
|
| TEMP.2014.6.1
|
damage to handle. burnt area by spout
|
|