| 22.3.22
|
Trendall and Cambitoglou, RFVA 1.124.210, attribute this fragment to the 'developed style' of the Lecce Painter, a follower of the Tarporley Painter.
|
|
| 28.6.3
|
Ure: 'Style of the Fat Boy Group'
|
|
| 28.6.4
|
Ure: 'Very bad Fat Boy style'
|
|
| 45.10.1
|
A.C. Smith. The lotus bud is quite unusual, and this and other decorative elements relate this epichysis to the Egg and Wave Group, a workshop that specialised in small vases and was related to he Iliupersis Painter. There is also a slight resemblance to the work of the Lampas Group, followers of the plain style: cf. Scottsdale, Cutler Collection (RVAp 11/206a). Although no other epichyses have been attributed to this group/artist, the group seems to represent the work of a versatile artist, influenced by the Truro and Lecce Painters and associates, who favored smaller vases, specialising in single figures, often animals, surrounded by ornament of the type shown on this epichysis, especially tendrils, buds, and bulls-eyes, with large added white dots. Cf. especially Karlsruhe B 938 (RVAp 10/232) and New London, Lyman Allyn Museum 1955.1.83 (RVAp 10/234).
|
|
| 45.8.2
|
Trendall and Cambitoglou, RFVA 1.282.196, class this pelike with 'vases near in style or comparable' to the Thyrsus Painter.
|
|
| 47.7.3
|
Trendall suggests this is 'closely associated in style with the Copenhagen Lekanis Group but related by the decorative patterns to the 'Painter of Naples 128012': LCS 292.482
|
|
| 49.8.3
|
Trendall, LCS 540.784, attributes this vase to the earlier style of the Branicki Painter (which is of a higher standard than his later works).
|
|
| 51.7.11
|
Trendall, PP 159.275, attributes this krater to Python's 'more developed' style
|
|
| REDMG:1935.87.23
|
Trendall and Cambitoglou, 2.1014 and 2.1015.906-907, class this kantharos, as well as Reading RM.25.53.32, as 'associated in style with the Kantharos Group'.
|
|
| REDMG:1951.137.1
|
Trendall and Cambitoglou, 1.285.233, attribute this lekanis lid to the Lampas Painter, a 'follower of the Plain Style tradition'.
|
|
| REDMG:1951.139.1
|
Trendall and Cambitoglou, RFVA 2.717.851, class this vessel with vases 'associated in style with the Painter of the Kassel Cup'.
|
|
| REDMG:1951.141
|
Trendall and Cambitoglou, RFVA 2.710.762, classes this bell krater as 'connected in style' with the Monopoli Painter.
|
|
| REDMG:1951.147.1
|
A.C. Smith prefers to attribute this vase to the Zaandam Group or one the other workshops of the Iliupersis Painter and the followers of the Hoppin Painter, who specialised in small, plain style pots. For comparanda in the Zaandam Group, 'closely connected' to the work of the Zaandam Painter (according to Cambitoglou and Trendall, RVAp 1.289) see Adolphseck 175-176 (RVAp 11/30-31) and Once London Market, Folio Fine Art (RVAp 1.32). I. McPhee prefers the Liverpool Group: for shape and ornament cf. Naples 669 (RVAp 2, 21/355a) and Wellcome R 1936.324 (RVAp 2, 21/372a) but figures are more akin to the latter, which is classed in group (iv). The white ivy wreath, with incised stems, on the body, is particularly common in this group, and especially well preserved on Dresden H 4. 29/90 (RVAp 2, 21/369).
|
|
| REDMG:1951.148
|
Trendall and Cambitoglou, RFVA 1.317 and 1.320.25, class this among vases in the 'developed style' of the Snub-nose Painter.
|
|
| REDMG:1951.160.1
|
Trendall, LCS 132.670, places this bell krater in the earliest group of vases attributed to the Roccanova Painter, which 'show Apulian influence most clearly' yet indicate the Roccanova Painter's developed style, e.g. the Z pattern, the palmette between the figures, and the stocky style of the figures.
|
|
| REDMG:1953.25.32
|
Trendall and Cambitoglou, 2.1014 and 2.1015.906-907, class this kantharos, as well as Reading RM.87.35.23, as 'associated in style with the Kantharos Group'.
|
|