| 13.10.4A-B
|
. The mirror is in better condition, with only a few worn and/or green patches, → while ← the lid is damaged at the edges and is covered on the underside with whiti |
|
| 22.3.33
|
Only one spot has been peeled off from the exterior, → while ← at the interior there are four bits that are chipped off and slight scratc |
|
| 42.9.1
|
Almost half of stephane missing on side B, → while ← the decoration of its remaining part is scraped off almost completely.No d |
|
| 45.10.14.2
|
n amphora. There is white plaster on the rim and side surfaces of the fragment, → while ← a thick layer was applied on the external surface of the neck. The decorat |
|
| 47.6.2A-B
|
About two thirds of the top rim of the lid are missing, → while ← one third of its side surface has been reconstructed. The rest of the lid |
|
| 48.12.2
|
places (not affecting decoration). Interior blotchy, as if water had been spilt → while ← material still wet.
|
|
| 50.12.18
|
Chip on the exterior to the lower left, → while ← the interior has a small hairline crack (?) beneath the orange circles.
|
|
| 50.4.10
|
Bowl assembled form 2 fragments. On the exterior, it is not at parts lustrous, → while ← at parts it is fired to dark brown.
|
|
| 50.5.4
|
Single fragment. Relatively clean break along right edge, → while ← the left is more jagged.
|
|
| E.65.3
|
is still smooth a large amount of the red pigment on the out side has worn away → while ← similar occurances inside have meant that some of the decoration has been |
|
| REDMG:1935.87.25
|
Side A is intact by side B, once broken in, has had two large pieces rejoined, → while ← one piece is missing. The rim and one handle are chipped. Decoration worn, |
|
| REDMG:1947.13.1
|
mouth, pitted, and scratched; traces of white plaster on the external surface, → while ← the interior and bottom are covered with plaster. Faded decoration in patc |
|
| REDMG:1953.25.66
|
Lip, mouth and one handle missing, → while ← the remaining handle has been rejoined. The base is chipped in two places; |
|