| 13.10.22
|
The jug is in good condition. → most ← of the rim is missing and there is a f |
|
| 14.9.110B
|
Both handle and → most ← of spout are missing. Messy glaze around foot ring. Glaze remains shiny.
|
|
| 14.9.49
|
Surface chips have taken away some paint and the part that has suffered → most ← has the main design. Hardly any deposits apart from some dusty parts on th |
|
| 2006.12.6
|
Single fragment comprising → most ← of the body of the vessel, and shoulder, with the lower part of the handle |
|
| 2007.9.1.10
|
Intact, but with some wear on the → most ← raised surfaces.
|
|
| 2007.9.1.12
|
Intact, but with some wear on the → most ← raised surfaces.
|
|
| 2007.9.1.17
|
Intact, but with some wear on the → most ← raised surfaces.
|
|
| 2007.9.1.18
|
Intact, but with some wear on the → most ← raised surfaces.
|
|
| 2007.9.1.25
|
Intact, but with some wear on the → most ← raised surfaces.
|
|
| 2007.9.1.3
|
Intact, but with some wear on the → most ← raised surfaces.
|
|
| 2007.9.1.7
|
Intact, but with some wear on the → most ← raised surfaces.
|
|
| 2007.9.1.9
|
Intact, but with some wear on the → most ← raised surfaces.
|
|
| 2007.9.1.99
|
Intact, image is of poor quality, but → most ← likely due to the cast or original gem.
|
|
| 2008.7.137
|
Fragment, chipped at edges. → most ← of the etched lines on the exterior have |
|
| 2008.9.10
|
Cast seems to be complete, but original object was → most ← likely broken, as the back half of the ship and half of one of the harpies |
|
| 2008.9.117
|
Decent; → most ← of the model objects are in good condition, but the stand for the model its |
|
| 22.3.40
|
left side; slight break at top attachment of handle. Leaves and berry pattern al→ most ← entirely vanished. Glaze slightly chipped all over.
|
|
| 22.3.41
|
Single fragment, roughly triangular preserving → most ← of the flat bottom and approximately 1/4 of the arc of the lower part of th |
|
| 22.9.6
|
ents yet to be reconstructed. A small fragment seems to have been missing when → most ← of the cup was put back together, therefore somebody has used plaster to re |
|
| 23.11.26
|
→ most ← of the paint in the lower half has been removed over time. The mouth |
|
| 23.11.27
|
gh the outside has had the paint removed in numerous spots. Bottom part has had → most ← of the paint removed, likely caused over time.
|
|
| 25.8.6
|
Incomplete, neck and mouth glued back on, → most ← of foot still missing. Decoration glaze has become very worn. The rim of th |
|
| 26.12.34
|
around lip and one chip on resting surface. Black glaze faded and worn away in → most ← areas to a dull grey.
|
|
| 26.12.8
|
Incomplete. → most ← of neck and all of mouth are missing. The decoration all |
|
| 26.2.28
|
erside are wearing away considerably compared to the topside which has retained → most ← of its colour apart from some white but it is now a little dull. Surfaces a |
|
| 26.7.9
|
Chipped throughout, → most ← notably at the mouth and base.
|
|
| 27.3.7
|
→ most ← of mouth restored so paint has been lost. A good amount of colour rem |
|
| 28.6.5
|
Complete and intact. Black glaze worn in → most ← places, → most ← notably on the top.
|
|
| 28.6.6
|
Damage to one handle al→ most ← breaking the circle. Complete handle has deposits (perhaps from burial). |
|
| 29.11.7
|
f the rim, as well as a bit of wear. There is evidence of greyish/white deposit → most ← noticeably around the rim and below one of the handles. Main zone in fairly |
|
| 37.11.1
|
Intact and shape undamaged. Colouring is worn away but the pattern of sca |
|
| 39.1.1
|
→ most ← of black glaze flaked off from upper part of vase.
|
|
| 45.10.10
|
Sixteen fragments that belong to the same kylix. There are parts of the ri |
|
| 45.6.40
|
Complete and intact, variations in colour with black glaze wearing thin in → most ← areas; white deposits on rim and interior.
|
|
| 47.10.3A-B
|
ejoined pieces, rejoined with some plaster restorations, preserving one handle, → most ← of the foot, and approximately 2/3 of the body of the bowl.
The surface on |
|
| 47.2.1
|
→ most ← of vertical handle missing. White deposits on handle, where broken, a |
|
| 48.12.4
|
Part of mouth missing. Paint badly worn. flaked on → most ← part. Scratches on the body.
|
|
| 48.5.2
|
to neck consisting of nine pieces. Large chip to foot. Small chips to body. On → most ← part of the figure decoration, handles, foot and mouth, black is fired to b |
|
| 49.8.4
|
Intact except for one chip on body and some small around the ring foot. Pa |
|
| 50.5.3
|
Mouth and upper part of neck modern and intact handle. → most ← of the black h |
|
| 50.5.6
|
Paint appears extremely dull and matt despite being badly worn. Flaked off from → most ← part of the decoration. Peach colour on small areas inside and correspondin |
|
| 51.7.2
|
and nearly complete, but missing a chip on the rim. Surface severely worn with → most ← of glaze chipped off. Some white deposits on the resting surface of the lid |
|
| 59.2.7
|
All that remains of the mummified cat is the head and neck, from which → most ← wrappings have been removed. The head is in a good state of preservation, s |
|
| 68.12.3
|
derside of the rim are covered in pinky/beige deposit. A white deposit occupies → most ← of the underside.
|
|
| 71.12.6
|
rge parts of bronze have broken away from the sides of the curved section. The → most ← important aspect to note is the deterioration in colour to blue, green, bla |
|
| 71.6.1
|
Single fragment comprising → most ← of a handle, broken off at the bottom; chipped on left side and generally w |
|
| 78.12.6
|
ome of the decoration is very worn. ther area around the nozzle has largly lost → most ← of its wash, however there are traces of black indicating usage. Some white |
|
| 78.12.8
|
Intact and complete. Wash is worn in → most ← areas, White and grey deposits in patches over the base, handle and nozzle. |
|
| 79.1.16
|
g, filling hole shape slightly obscured by missing area of discus. Wash worn in → most ← place, superficial chips in the body blackening along the left side of the |
|
| 83.10.1
|
Quite badly worn. It has been glued back together using three fragments. |
|
| 85.3.1
|
30+ fragments rejoined, but missing at least 7 more. → most ← of neck and mout |
|
| E.23.43.2
|
Intact and copmplete, there are several impurities in the glaze, → most ← notably a long line of black substance that appears to be stuck to the bead |
|
| E.23.44
|
Intact and complete. The blue glaze is quite worn in some areas, → most ← notably at the top of the crown where it has toally worn away and reveals t |
|
| E.23.47.1
|
→ most ← of the beads have lost their original sheen and several of them have |
|
| E.23.51
|
In tact and complete (although presumabley once part of a necklace). → most ← |
|
| E.23.53
|
have been reattatched, the crack is evident. → most ← if the glaze is gone, as has → most ← of the green colour. The hieroglyphs are incomplete as are → most ← of the othe |
|
| E.23.56
|
Intact and complete, although the glaze is → most ←ly gone → most ← of the green pigment remains. The details remain clear althoug |
|
| E.23.57
|
Intact and complete, → most ← of the glaze and a large portion of the green pigment is gone. The are sev |
|
| E.23.59
|
Intact and complete although it is presumed that the necklace has been res |
|
| E.62.16
|
ome of the black pigment has gone and several edges have slight scratches. The → most ← significant damage is a scratch on the side with twelve dots that goes from |
|
| E.63.3
|
Intact and complete, → most ← of the green pigment has faded although the glaze remains.
|
|
| L.2016.3.9
|
edges are younger. The black paint is slightly worn but well preserved for the → most ← part.
|
|
| REDMG:1926.99.60
|
(Modern) lacquer over → most ← of surface
|
|
| REDMG:1935.87.4
|
Intact. Paint is dirty thus losing its glaze in → most ← areas and appearing very dull. Large areas of black have worn away, especi |
|
| REDMG:1953.25.25
|
Handle, mouth and → most ← of neck are missing. The surface is cracked, and has peeled off in some par |
|
| REDMG:1953.25.29
|
Mouth, neck, and → most ← of handle missing. Black glaze chipped; brownish-grey deposits on shoulder, |
|
| REDMG:1953.25.39
|
Comprised of two rejoined pieces, missing 1/8 of rim and upper body and → most ← of one handle. Tan deposits around rim, handles, and foot, including unders |
|
| REDMG:1953.25.64
|
RM.1692.64 and RM.1694.64) preserving part of neck, shoulder, half of body, and → most ← of base. Surface dulled.
|
|
| REDMG:1953.25.9
|
eces, missing two-thirds of rim, attached parts of body, all of one handle, and → most ← of the other. Foot chipped; tan deposits on interior.
|
|
| REDMG:1953.41.1
|
om river sediment (light greyish brown, with some reddish brown in areas) cover → most ← of the vase, especially the handles and foot, where the deposits have built |
|
| REDMG:1964.1604.1
|
Large part of handle missing, → most ← of the wash has worn off. Slight hairline crack in the base, rust coloured |
|
| REDMG:1964.1613.1
|
Missing → most ← of the nozzle, small amount of wick hole visiably blackened, probably from |
|
| REDMG:1964.1668.1
|
Part of the rim and foot are missing, surface of the body is uneven, and → most ← of the wash is worn.
|
|
| REDMG:1964.1705.1
|
→ most ← of the rim is missing and there is a crack along the neck of the vase |
|
| TEMP.2003.6.17
|
Fifteen fragments that belong to the same kylix. There are parts of the ri |
|
| TEMP.2003.6.6
|
e (that is missing) and part of the vessel's body. White plaster is apparent on → most ← of the external surface. Traces of adhesives? exist on the internal surface |
|