| 11.10.3
|
Complete and intact. There are tiny air bubbles over the surface, as well |
|
| 2008.9.49
|
Fragment; chips throughout; white → material ← (plaster? glue?) on broken edges.
|
|
| 25.6.2
|
it on the main zone, some of which runs in circles, showing the gradient of the → material ←. There are cracks on the glaze around the top of the foot, below which |
|
| 26.12.12
|
Soft → material ←, prone to crumbling and surface is dusty. Design is still clear althou |
|
| 30.11.4
|
Complete but repaired. The paint has become very faded on the exterior mo |
|
| 45.10.18
|
adly damaged with i)small section of decoration missing, white deposit possibly → material ← used to glue fragment back together. Cross section shows that the vesse |
|
| 45.6.55
|
on mouth 2.0cm, small chip on base. Deposits omn the surface of white and grey → material ← and few scratches on body.
|
|
| 48.12.2
|
(not affecting decoration). Interior blotchy, as if water had been spilt while → material ← still wet.
|
|
| 50.5.3
|
has faded to a light brown color. The neck and mouth has been rebuilt by modern → material ←. The surface appears in fairly good condition, except for some deep scr |
|
| 71.12.5
|
Two holes have been restored with transparent → material ←. The end of the strigil is damaged. Discolouration of bronze to green |
|
| 73.6.4
|
wn colour. The inside gloss shows some scratches that run with the grain of the → material ←, as well as some small flakes missing.
|
|
| E.23.44
|
of the crown where it has toally worn away and reveals the original terracotta → material ←. This is slightly true also around the ears.
|
|
| REDMG:1953.25.107
|
solid blocks. The relief remains unworn. Deposits have clung to the underside → material ←.
|
|
| REDMG:1953.25.88
|
Deposits lie on surface and in hollows beneath shawl. Facial features sli |
|