| 2007.10.2.44
|
Right half damaged, image gone completely
|
|
| 2007.9.1.99
|
Intact, image is of poor quality, but most likely due to the cast or original gem.
|
|
| 2009.10.2.274
|
Slightly worn image and damaged around the edges
|
|
| 2009.10.2.284
|
Worn image
|
|
| 2009.10.2.347
|
Intact but worn image
|
|
| 2009.10.2.349
|
Intact but worn image
|
|
| 2009.10.2.385
|
Slightly damaged edges and worn image
|
|
| 2009.10.2.395
|
Slightly worn and unclear image
|
|
| 2009.10.2.396
|
Intact but worn image
|
|
| 2009.10.2.410
|
Intact but faded image
|
|
| 2009.10.2.62
|
Damaged at the bottom, hard to distinguish image.
|
|
| E.62.3
|
Single fragment. The image is complete except for the large chip in the head of the worshipper. There is also Red pigment remaining on his body. The bottom left of the fragment has no image and is speckled with a grey deposit.
|
|
| L.2013.10.4
|
worn and discoloured surface, not symmetrical but intact. Image visible on one side but reverse is illegible.
|
|
| L.2014.8.2
|
Good,inscription and image visible on both sides.
|
|
| L.2014.8.3
|
Poor. Image and inscription faintly visible on the obverse but not on the reverse.
|
|
| L.2014.8.4
|
Poor. Inscription and image only faintly visible on either side.
|
|
| L.2014.8.5
|
Good. Inscription and image clearly visible on both sides.
|
|
| TEMP.2007.3.56
|
discolouration, worn all over; on obverse, text and image worn and on reverse, text on left is clear but right hand side is worn; complete
|
|